Brown v. Edmonds

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. Edmonds

63 F. App'x 774

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 29, 2003·No. No. 03-6488·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Demarcus M. Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea[775] soning of the district court. See Brown v. Edmonds, No. CA-03-132-7 (W.D.Va. filed Feb. 25, 2003 & entered Feb. 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Demarcus M. Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea[775] soning of the district court. See Brown v. Edmonds, No. CA-03-132-7 (W.D.Va. filed Feb. 25, 2003 & entered Feb. 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brown v. Edmonds, 63 F. App'x 774 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

63 F. App'x 774 (Brown v. Edmonds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related