Brown v. Earnhardt

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Brown v. Earnhardt

378 S.E.2d 261, 298 S.C. 74, 1989 S.C. LEXIS 105

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 19, 1989·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Petitioner asks this Court to issue a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Brown, et al. v. Earnhardt, 374 S. E. (2d) 513 (S. C. App. 1988). We grant the writ on all questions raised by petitioner.

The Appendix shall be docketed as of the date of this order. Petitioner shall file eight additional copies of the Appendix by the deadline for filing the petitioner’s brief. These additional copies need not be certified. The parties are directed to file briefs in accordance with Rule 8 of the Rule of Practice of the Supreme Court, except only one original brief and nine copies shall be required. This matter shall proceed in conformity with the Court’s rules.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Petitioner asks this Court to issue a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in Brown, et al. v. Earnhardt, 374 S. E. (2d) 513 (S. C. App. 1988). We grant the writ on all questions raised by petitioner.

The Appendix shall be docketed as of the date of this order. Petitioner shall file eight additional copies of the Appendix by the deadline for filing the petitioner’s brief. These additional copies need not be certified. The parties are directed to file briefs in accordance with Rule 8 of the Rule of Practice of the Supreme Court, except only one original brief and nine copies shall be required. This matter shall proceed in conformity with the Court’s rules.

It is so ordered.

Brown v. Earnhardt, 378 S.E.2d 261, 298 S.C. 74, 1989 S.C. LEXIS 105 (S.C. 1989).

Pincite

378 S.E.2d 261 (Brown v. Earnhardt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related