Brown v. Dunham
1 Root 272
This text of 1 Root 272 (Brown v. Dunham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brown v. Dunham, 1 Root 272 (Colo. 1791).
Opinion
Judgment — Manifest error. The defendant being a minor under the care of his parent, was incapable of making a contract, except for necessaries, therefore could not be guilty of a fraud in contracting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Greensboro Morris Plan Co. v. Palmer
116 S.E. 261 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)
Slayton v. Barry
49 L.R.A. 560 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1900)
Rice v. Boyer
9 N.E. 420 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1886)
Ferguson v. Bobo
54 Miss. 121 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1876)
Gilson v. Spear
38 Vt. 311 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1865)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-dunham-conn-1791.