Brown v. Dunham
1 Root 272
Opinion
Judgment — Manifest error. The defendant being a minor under the care of his parent, was incapable of making a contract, except for necessaries, therefore could not be guilty of a fraud in contracting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. Dunham, 1 Root 272 (Colo. 1791).
1 Root 272 (Brown v. Dunham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Greensboro Morris Plan Co. v. Palmer
116 S.E. 261 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)
Slayton v. Barry
49 L.R.A. 560 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1900)
Rice v. Boyer
9 N.E. 420 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1886)
Ferguson v. Bobo
54 Miss. 121 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1876)
Gilson v. Spear
38 Vt. 311 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1865)