Brown v. Domino's Pizza/MBR Management

527 S.W.3d 185, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 838, 2017 WL 3707465
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 29, 2017·No. No. ED 105191·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Domino’s Pizza/MBR Management appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) awarding Paul Brown medical expenses. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude it contains sufficient competent and substantial evidence to support the Commission’s award. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 222-23 (Mo. banc 2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri- Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Domino's Pizza/MBR Management, 527 S.W.3d 185, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 838, 2017 WL 3707465 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

527 S.W.3d 185 (Brown v. Domino's Pizza/MBR Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection
121 S.W.3d 220 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2003)