Brown v. Domino's Pizza/MBR Management
This text of 527 S.W.3d 185 (Brown v. Domino's Pizza/MBR Management) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Domino’s Pizza/MBR Management appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) awarding Paul Brown medical expenses. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude it contains sufficient competent and substantial evidence to support the Commission’s award. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 222-23 (Mo. banc 2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri- Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
527 S.W.3d 185, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 838, 2017 WL 3707465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-dominos-pizzambr-management-moctapp-2017.