Brown v. Dodge

32 Me. 167
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1850
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 Me. 167 (Brown v. Dodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Dodge, 32 Me. 167 (Me. 1850).

Opinion

Shepley, C. J.,

orally.—The transaction with Dodge was verbal, unexecuted, and without any consideration. So the thing stood when Chapin took. The ash passed to him as a part of the realty. Neither Bell and Healy, or Chamberlin, at that late day, had any right to sever it. The giving of the note by Dodge and the bill of sale to him, were subsequent to Chapin’s purchase. No rights accrued therefrom. By the deed from Chapin, the whole title passed to the plaintiff. The conversation, had, when plaintiff purchased, was quite too [169]*169loose to show the plaintiff’s consent that Dodge, or any one tinder him, should take the ash. Defendant defaulted.

Rowe, for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gullicksen v. Shadoan
218 P.2d 714 (Montana Supreme Court, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Me. 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-dodge-me-1850.