Brown v. Doby

94 S.E.2d 895, 244 N.C. 746, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 511
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. Doby. Read the opinion of the Court — 242 N.C. 462
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 7, 1956·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon failure to acquire by gift or purchase, discretionary power existed in the petitioners to select and take land (not exceeding 30 acres) for school purposes. No right to stay the taking existed in the respondents. Board of Education v. Allen, 243 N.C. 520, 91 S.E. 2d 180. The respondents’ rights are limited to the recovery of damages. The petitioners’ liability is to pay them. The parties failed to agree as to the amount. The jury, in accordance with applicable rules of law, decided the issue. No reason appears why the result should be disturbed.

No error.

Johnson, J., not sitting. Rodman, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Doby, 94 S.E.2d 895, 244 N.C. 746, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 511 (N.C. 1956).

94 S.E.2d 895 (Brown v. Doby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burlington City Board of Education v. Allen
91 S.E.2d 180 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)