Brown v. Div. of Emp't Sec.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brown v. Div. of Emp't Sec.

577 S.W.3d 864

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 28, 2019·No. WD 82291·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Cardell Brown appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him unemployment benefits. He claims in three points on appeal that the Commission erred because he was not discharged for misconduct and that the Deputy failed to make an intelligent review. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Cardell Brown appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him unemployment benefits. He claims in three points on appeal that the Commission erred because he was not discharged for misconduct and that the Deputy failed to make an intelligent review. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Brown v. Div. of Emp't Sec., 577 S.W.3d 864 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

577 S.W.3d 864 (Brown v. Div. of Emp't Sec.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.