Brown v. Director, Virginia Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. Director, Virginia Department of Corrections

6 F. App'x 122

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 7, 2001

Docket00-7372

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 F. App'x 122 (Brown v. Director, Virginia Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, 6 F. App'x 122 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Troy Atera Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000) without prejudice for failure to comply with a district court order. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). Because Brown may reinstate his suit by merely providing information requested by the district court, we lack jurisdiction to decide this appeal. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066— 67 (4th Cir.1993). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and deny a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Troy Atera Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000) without prejudice for failure to comply with a district court order. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). Because Brown may reinstate his suit by merely providing information requested by the district court, we lack jurisdiction to decide this appeal. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066— 67 (4th Cir.1993). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and deny a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 F. App'x 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-director-virginia-department-of-corrections-ca4-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack