Brown v. Crist
This text of 973 So. 2d 1152 (Brown v. Crist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sylvester L. BROWN, Petitioner,
v.
Charlie CRIST, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sylvester L. Brown, Petitioner, pro se.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Linda Horton Dodson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
We deny on the merits, without discussion, the petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of the trial court's order denying a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a forfeiture of gain-time. However, because the trial court proceeding was a "collateral criminal proceeding," it was exempt from the lien provisions of section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2005). See Schmidt v. Crusoe, 878 So.2d 361 (Fla. 2003). Accordingly, we vacate the trial court's order to the extent it placed a lien on petitioner's inmate trust account.
ERVIN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
973 So. 2d 1152, 2006 WL 2505215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-crist-fladistctapp-2006.