Brown v. Cowell
12 Johns. 384
Opinion
This judgment must be affirmed. The admission of the witness to be re-examined privately, by the jury, would have been improper had not the parties consented to it. .And although the question, put by the juror, was improper, the answer was given before the justice could correct it, and he did. every thing that he could do, by telling the jury that the evidence was improper. Besides, the parties, having consented to the examination, ought not now to be permitted to object to what took place upon such examination,
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. Cowell, 12 Johns. 384 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1815).
12 Johns. 384 (Brown v. Cowell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Soule
30 N.Y. Crim. 214 (New York County Courts, 1913)
Beggs v. Chicago, Wisconsin & Minnesota Railroad
44 N.W. 633 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1890)
Richards v. Noyes
44 Wis. 609 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1878)
Batchelder v. Batchelder
84 Mass. 105 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1861)
Allen v. Town of Hancock
16 Vt. 230 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1844)