Brown v. Cowell

New York Supreme Court

Brown v. Cowell

12 Johns. 384

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1815

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 12 Johns. 384 (Brown v. Cowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Cowell, 12 Johns. 384 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1815).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This judgment must be affirmed. The admission of the witness to be re-examined privately, by the jury, would have been improper had not the parties consented to it. .And although the question, put by the juror, was improper, the answer was given before the justice could correct it, and he did. every thing that he could do, by telling the jury that the evidence was improper. Besides, the parties, having consented to the examination, ought not now to be permitted to object to what took place upon such examination,

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This judgment must be affirmed. The admission of the witness to be re-examined privately, by the jury, would have been improper had not the parties consented to it. .And although the question, put by the juror, was improper, the answer was given before the justice could correct it, and he did. every thing that he could do, by telling the jury that the evidence was improper. Besides, the parties, having consented to the examination, ought not now to be permitted to object to what took place upon such examination,

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Johns. 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-cowell-nysupct-1815.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack