Brown v. Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided June 30, 2014·No. Civil Action No. 2014-0264·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ___________________________________ ) THOMAS LEROY BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 14-0264 (EGS) ) COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER ) SUPERVISION AGENCY, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 8, 2014, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment [ECF

No. 5]. The Court issued an Order [ECF No. 6] advising the plaintiff of his obligations under the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond to the motion.

Specifically, the Order warned the plaintiff that, if he did not file his opposition by May 9, 2014,

the Court would treat the motion as conceded. To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an

opposition nor has requested more time to do so. Therefore, the Court will grant the defendant’s

motion as conceded and dismiss this action.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

Signed: EMMET G. SULLIVAN United States District Judge

Dated: June 30, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency, (D.D.C. 2014).

Brown v. Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency (Brown v. Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.