Brown v. . Cotter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Brown v. . Cotter

146 S.E. 925, 196 N.C. 819, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 113

DecidedJanuary 9, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 146 S.E. 925 (Brown v. . Cotter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. . Cotter, 146 S.E. 925, 196 N.C. 819, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 113 (N.C. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee CueiaM.

Plaintiff and defendant are owners of adjoining tracts of land, situate in Cherokee County, North Carolina.

This action involves title to a parcel of land, containing about twenty-four acres, and grows out of a controversy as to the location of the dividing line between said tracts of land. The determinative questions involve, first, the location of the beginning point called for in the grant and deeds under which plaintiff claims title to the land in dispute; and, second, the possession of said land by defendant and those under whom he claims.

*820 There was evidence in support of the verdict. "We find no error in the instructions of the court in the charge to the jury. The assignments of error on defendant’s appeal to this Court cannot be sustained. They present no questions which seem to require or justify discussion. The judgment is affirmed. There is

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee CueiaM.

Plaintiff and defendant are owners of adjoining tracts of land, situate in Cherokee County, North Carolina.

This action involves title to a parcel of land, containing about twenty-four acres, and grows out of a controversy as to the location of the dividing line between said tracts of land. The determinative questions involve, first, the location of the beginning point called for in the grant and deeds under which plaintiff claims title to the land in dispute; and, second, the possession of said land by defendant and those under whom he claims.

*820 There was evidence in support of the verdict. "We find no error in the instructions of the court in the charge to the jury. The assignments of error on defendant’s appeal to this Court cannot be sustained. They present no questions which seem to require or justify discussion. The judgment is affirmed. There is

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 S.E. 925, 196 N.C. 819, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-cotter-nc-1929.