Brown v. Cornerstone Schools of Washington

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided April 29, 2011·No. Civil Action No. 2010-1418·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

) L.G. BROWN et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-1418 (BAH) ) CORNERSTONE SCHOOLS ) OF WASHINGTON, ) ) Defendant. ) )

MEMORANDUM

This matter is before the Court on the Defendant’s motion to dismiss or for summary

judgment. By Order of February 17, 2011, the Plaintiff, suing on behalf of her two minor

children, was ordered to respond to the Defendant’s dispositive motion by March 28, 2011. She

was advised that her failure to oppose the motion within the time allowed could result in

dismissal of the case on what the Court would treat as a conceded motion. The Plaintiff has

neither responded to the pending dispositive nor sought additional time to do so. Therefore, the

Court will treat the Defendant’s motion to dismiss as conceded and will dismiss the case. See

FDIC v. Bender, 127 F.3d 58, 68 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (discretion lies with the district court to grant

unopposed motion to dismiss as conceded pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(b)). A separate Order

accompanies this Memorandum.

/s/ Beryl A. Howell United States District Judge DATE: April 29, 2011

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Cornerstone Schools of Washington, (D.D.C. 2011).

Brown v. Cornerstone Schools of Washington (Brown v. Cornerstone Schools of Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Bender
127 F.3d 58 (D.C. Circuit, 1997)