Brown v. Cornerstone Schools of Washington
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
) L.G. BROWN et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-1418 (BAH) ) CORNERSTONE SCHOOLS ) OF WASHINGTON, ) ) Defendant. ) )
MEMORANDUM
This matter is before the Court on the Defendant’s motion to dismiss or for summary
judgment. By Order of February 17, 2011, the Plaintiff, suing on behalf of her two minor
children, was ordered to respond to the Defendant’s dispositive motion by March 28, 2011. She
was advised that her failure to oppose the motion within the time allowed could result in
dismissal of the case on what the Court would treat as a conceded motion. The Plaintiff has
neither responded to the pending dispositive nor sought additional time to do so. Therefore, the
Court will treat the Defendant’s motion to dismiss as conceded and will dismiss the case. See
FDIC v. Bender, 127 F.3d 58, 68 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (discretion lies with the district court to grant
unopposed motion to dismiss as conceded pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(b)). A separate Order
accompanies this Memorandum.
/s/ Beryl A. Howell United States District Judge DATE: April 29, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. Cornerstone Schools of Washington (Brown v. Cornerstone Schools of Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.