Brown v. Cook

Superior Court of New Hampshire

Brown v. Cook

3 N.H. 64

Superior Court of New Hampshire·Decided May 15, 1824·Published

Opinion

By the court.

Nothing can be clearer, than that, where two men are jointly concerned in any transaction, under an agreement to share between them the profits of the business indefinitely, they must be considered as partners in the transaction. 16 John. 34.-2 H. Bl. 235.-2 W. Bl. 998—1 H. Bl. 43, 45, 48.—Doug. 373.—15 John. 422.

And, as the law was so stated to the jury, there must be

Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the court.

Nothing can be clearer, than that, where two men are jointly concerned in any transaction, under an agreement to share between them the profits of the business indefinitely, they must be considered as partners in the transaction. 16 John. 34.-2 H. Bl. 235.-2 W. Bl. 998—1 H. Bl. 43, 45, 48.—Doug. 373.—15 John. 422.

And, as the law was so stated to the jury, there must be

Judgment on the verdict.

Brown v. Cook, 3 N.H. 64 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1824).

Pincite

3 N.H. 64 (Brown v. Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related