Brown v. CONTEMPORARY DESIGN CONCEPTS

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brown v. CONTEMPORARY DESIGN CONCEPTS

270 S.W.3d 470, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1559, 2008 WL 4977271

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 25, 2008·No. WD 68500·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Contemporary Design Concepts, LLC, and Jim Dyer appeal the trial court’s judgment in favor of Richard Brown on his breach of contract and unjust enrichment claims against them.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Contemporary Design Concepts, LLC, and Jim Dyer appeal the trial court’s judgment in favor of Richard Brown on his breach of contract and unjust enrichment claims against them.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Brown v. CONTEMPORARY DESIGN CONCEPTS, 270 S.W.3d 470, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1559, 2008 WL 4977271 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

270 S.W.3d 470 (Brown v. CONTEMPORARY DESIGN CONCEPTS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.