Brown v. Condon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brown v. Condon

186 A.D.2d 43

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 17, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 A.D.2d 43 (Brown v. Condon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Condon, 186 A.D.2d 43 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly S. Cohen, J.), entered August 6, 1991, which denied petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent Commissioner’s termination of petitioner’s probationary employment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner’s subsequent acquittal on charges of having violated the Vehicle and Traffic Law does not satisfy his burden of establishing that he was terminated in bad faith. Petitioner left the scene of an accident and refused to take a breathalyzer test when ordered to do so by a superior officer (see, Matter of Holder v Sielaff, 184 AD2d 228; Thomas v City of New York, 169 AD2d 496; see also, Matter of Soto v Koehler, 171 AD2d 567, lv denied 78 NY2d 855). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly S. Cohen, J.), entered August 6, 1991, which denied petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent Commissioner’s termination of petitioner’s probationary employment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner’s subsequent acquittal on charges of having violated the Vehicle and Traffic Law does not satisfy his burden of establishing that he was terminated in bad faith. Petitioner left the scene of an accident and refused to take a breathalyzer test when ordered to do so by a superior officer (see, Matter of Holder v Sielaff, 184 AD2d 228; Thomas v City of New York, 169 AD2d 496; see also, Matter of Soto v Koehler, 171 AD2d 567, lv denied 78 NY2d 855). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 A.D.2d 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-condon-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack