Brown v. Comm'r

2007 T.C. Summary Opinion 166, 2007 Tax Ct. Summary LEXIS 173
United States Tax Court·Decided September 24, 2007·No. No. 6412-04S·Unpublished

Opinion

DAVID M. AND PHYLLIS E. BROWN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Brown v. Comm'r
No. 6412-04S
United States Tax Court
T.C. Summary Opinion 2007-166; 2007 Tax Ct. Summary LEXIS 173;
September 24, 2007, Filed

PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b), THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.

*173
David M. and Phyllis E. Brown, pro sese.
Randall L. Preheim, for respondent.
Vasquez, Juan F.

JUAN F. VASQUEZ

VASQUEZ, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed. 1 Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other case.

This case is before the Court on respondent's motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 121. After a concession, 2 the sole issue for decision is whether petitioners can exclude from income wages earned during 2000 from working in Antarctica.

BACKGROUND

At the time they filed the petition, petitioners resided in Green Valley, Arizona. During 2000, petitioners performed services at McMurdo Station in Ross Island, Antarctica. On their 2000 Federal income tax return, petitioners excluded wage *174 income earned and received during 2000 for services performed in Antarctica.

DISCUSSION

I. Summary Judgment

Rule 121(a) provides that either party may move for summary judgment upon all or any part of the legal issues in controversy. Full or partial summary judgment may be granted only if it is demonstrated that no genuine issue exists as to any material fact and that the legal issues presented by the motion may be decided as a matter of law. See Rule 121(b); Sundstrand Corp. v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. 518, 520 (1992), affd. 17 F.3d 965 (7th Cir. 1994). We conclude that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that a decision may be rendered as a matter of law.

II. In General

Section 61(a) provides that gross income means all income from whatever source derived. Accordingly, citizens of the United States generally are taxed on income earned outside the geographical boundaries of the United States unless the income is specifically excluded from gross income. Specking v. Commissioner, 117 T.C. 95, 101-102 (2001), affd. sub nom. Haessly v. Commissioner, 68 Fed. Appx. 44 (9th Cir. 2003), affd. sub nom. Umbach v. Commissioner, 357 F.3d 1108 (10th Cir. 2003). Exclusions from income *175 are construed narrowly, and taxpayers must bring themselves within the clear scope of the exclusion. Id.

III. Section 911

In Arnett v. Commissioner, 126 T.C. 89, 91-96 (2006) (Arnett I), affd. 473 F.3d 790 (7th Cir. 2007) (Arnett II), we addressed the arguments made by the parties herein regarding section 911. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit agreed with our analysis of section 911 and affirmed our conclusion that Antarctica is not a "foreign country" pursuant to section 911 and the regulations thereunder. Arnett v. Commissioner, 473 F.3d at 799. We shall not repeat our analysis from Arnett I herein. We follow our analysis and holding in Arnett I and the analysis and holding of the Court of Appeals in Arnett II. 3*176

IV. Conclusion

Accordingly, for the reasons stated in Arnett I, Arnett II, and herein, we conclude

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Comm'r, 2007 T.C. Summary Opinion 166, 2007 Tax Ct. Summary LEXIS 173 (tax 2007).

2007 T.C. Summary Opinion 166 (Brown v. Comm'r) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

HCSC-Laundry v. United States
450 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1981)
Dave Arnett v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
473 F.3d 790 (Seventh Circuit, 2007)
Specking v. Comm'r
117 T.C. No. 9 (U.S. Tax Court, 2001)
Arnett v. Comm'r
126 T.C. No. 5 (U.S. Tax Court, 2006)
Sundstrand Corp. v. Commissioner
98 T.C. No. 36 (U.S. Tax Court, 1992)
Haessly v. Commissioner
68 F. App'x 44 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)