Brown v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Brown v. Commonwealth

979 A.2d 845, 602 Pa. 206, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1708

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 19, 2009·No. 100 EM 2009·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2009, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453, 462 (1994) (hybrid representation improper). The Prothonotary is directed to forward these filings to counsel of record. See MC-51-CR-0052025-2007.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2009, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453, 462 (1994) (hybrid representation improper). The Prothonotary is directed to forward these filings to counsel of record. See MC-51-CR-0052025-2007.

Brown v. Commonwealth, 979 A.2d 845, 602 Pa. 206, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1708 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

979 A.2d 845 (Brown v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related