Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided February 8, 2023·No. 6:20-cv-01162-MC·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

ANGELA MARJORIE B. Civil No. 6:20-cv-01162-MC

Plaintiff, ORDER TO PAY SUPPLEMENTAL vs., EAJA FEES COMMISSIONER Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

MCSHANE, JUDGE: Following my review of Plaintiff’s Motion and supporting documentation, and after consideration of Defendant’s response, and pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an additional $4,792. 82 is awarded to Plaintiff in care of his attorney, Nancy J. Meserow, as supplemental EAJA fees, to be paid in addition to, and not instead of, EAJA fees and expenses previously awarded in the amount $13,614.60 and $10.00 respectively; and the check for Supplemental EAJA fees shall be made payable to Nancy J. Meserow, based upon Plaintiff’s assignment of these amounts to Plaintiff’s attorney Nancy J. Meserow, subject to the satisfaction of Plaintiff's debts, if any, under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010). // // // ORDER to PAY SUPP. EAJA fees– 6:20-cv-01162-MC Page 1 her attorney, Nancy J. Meserow, at her office, located at the following address: Law Office of Nancy J. Meserow 7540 SW 51st Ave. Portland, OR 97219.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 8th day of February 2023.

s/ Michael J. McShane MICHAEL J. MCSHANE United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2023).

Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Brown v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)