Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

TIMOTHY BROWN, 2:19-CV-12965-TGB

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION vs.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge David R. Grand’s Report and Recommendation of February 24, 2020 (ECF No. 12) recommending that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 9) be denied. The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections “[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy” of a report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a “de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made.” Id. Where, as here, neither party objects to the

report, the district court is not obligated to independently review the record. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). The Court will therefore accept the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation of February 24, 2020 as this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Grand’s Report and Recommendation of February 24, 2020 is

ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint is DENIED.

DATED: April 30, 2020.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Terrence G. Berg TERRENCE G. BERG United States District Judge