Brown v. Clerk
This text of Brown v. Clerk (Brown v. Clerk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7483
JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
CLERK,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge. (1:10-cv-02594-BEL)
Submitted: January 25, 2011 Decided: March 11, 2011
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. Clerk,
No. 1:10-cv-02594-BEL (D. Md. Sep. 24, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brown v. Clerk, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-clerk-ca4-2011.