Brown v. Clark
This text of 620 So. 2d 1327 (Brown v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In re Clark, Tyrone G., & Assoc.; Denta-Care Professional Corp.; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs, writ of mandamus; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW93 1289; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “M”, No. 369,254.
Writ granted in part, denied in part, and remanded. Relator’s motion and amended motion to dismiss are denied. The order of injunction issued on July 9, 1993 is stayed pending the resolution of the appeal from the administrative ruling in the case entitled Tyrone G. Clark & Associates Denta-Care, A Professional Dental Corporation v. James H. “Jim” Brown, Commissioner of Insurance for the State of Louisiana, 19th Judicial District Court, No. 396,100, Div. “M.” The ease is remanded to the First Circuit Court of Appeal for its determination of when the appeal has been resolved and, accordingly, when the stay should be lifted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
620 So. 2d 1327, 1993 La. LEXIS 2327, 1993 WL 279639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-clark-la-1993.