Brown v. City of Silverton

Oregon Supreme Court

Brown v. City of Silverton

93 P. 237, 50 Or. 425, 1908 Ore. LEXIS 196

Oregon Supreme Court·Decided January 16, 1908·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Commissioner Slater.

The material facts being identical with the case of Cusiter v. City of Silverton, 50 Or. 419 (93 Pac. 234), that case is controlling. Therefore the judgment appealed from should be modified, and the cause remanded to the lower court, with instructions to remand to the trial 'court, with directions to set aside the judgment and take such further proceedings therein as may be proper, not inconsistent with this opinion. The petitioner should recover costs in this court. Modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mr. Commissioner Slater.

The material facts being identical with the case of Cusiter v. City of Silverton, 50 Or. 419 (93 Pac. 234), that case is controlling. Therefore the judgment appealed from should be modified, and the cause remanded to the lower court, with instructions to remand to the trial 'court, with directions to set aside the judgment and take such further proceedings therein as may be proper, not inconsistent with this opinion. The petitioner should recover costs in this court. Modified.

Brown v. City of Silverton, 93 P. 237, 50 Or. 425, 1908 Ore. LEXIS 196 (Or. 1908).

Pincite

93 P. 237 (Brown v. City of Silverton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related