Brown v. City of Silverton
This text of 93 P. 237 (Brown v. City of Silverton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The material facts being identical with the case of Cusiter v. City of Silverton, 50 Or. 419 (93 Pac. 234), that case is controlling. Therefore the judgment appealed from should be modified, and the cause remanded to the lower court, with instructions to remand to the trial 'court, with directions to set aside the judgment and take such further proceedings therein as may be proper, not inconsistent with this opinion. The petitioner should recover costs in this court. Modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 P. 237, 50 Or. 425, 1908 Ore. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-city-of-silverton-or-1908.