Brown v. City of Philadelphia ex rel. Horter

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Brown v. City of Philadelphia ex rel. Horter

6 A. 904, 3 Sadler 45, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 731

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 4, 1886

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 A. 904 (Brown v. City of Philadelphia ex rel. Horter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. City of Philadelphia ex rel. Horter, 6 A. 904, 3 Sadler 45, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 731 (Pa. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Trunkey:

This case was tried in the court below and argued here, with [46]*46Pepper v. Philadelphia, 114 Pa. 96, 5 Cent. Pep. 693, 6 Atl. 899. The only difference requiring note is that Brown’s son signed the writing with Frederick, for his father. It is not pretended that the signing of the name of William Brown was a forgery. As to extent of authority, and ratification of the signing by the son, nothing need be said in support of the rulings of the learned judge of the common pleas.

For the reasons stated in Pepper v. Philadelphia,—

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI