Brown v. City of New York

Supreme Court

Brown v. City of New York

242 U.S. 612, 37 S. Ct. 19, 61 L. Ed. 527, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1406

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 30, 1916·No. No. 3·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consol. Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471-472; (2) Shoemaker v. United States, 147 U. S. 282, 321; Prosser v. Northern Pacific R. R., 152 U. S. 59; Bauman v. Ross, 167 U. S. 548, 596; Ramapo Water Co. v. City of New York, 236 U. S. 579. Mr. Omri F. Hibbard, Mr. N. T. M. Melliss and Mr. Nathan I. Sachs for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Terence Farley for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consol. Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471-472; (2) Shoemaker v. United States, 147 U. S. 282, 321; Prosser v. Northern Pacific R. R., 152 U. S. 59; Bauman v. Ross, 167 U. S. 548, 596; Ramapo Water Co. v. City of New York, 236 U. S. 579. Mr. Omri F. Hibbard, Mr. N. T. M. Melliss and Mr. Nathan I. Sachs for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Terence Farley for the defendant in error.

Brown v. City of New York, 242 U.S. 612, 37 S. Ct. 19, 61 L. Ed. 527, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1406 (1916).

Pincite

242 U.S. 612 (Brown v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related