Brown v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brown v. City of New York

5 A.D.3d 420, 772 N.Y.S.2d 613

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 289 A.D.2d 95 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 8, 2004·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the plaintiff (1) from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.), dated June 7, 2001, and (2), as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of the same court dated January 9, 2003.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated June 7, 2001, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated January 9, 2003; and it is further,

Ordered, that the order dated January 9, 2003, is affirmed with one bill of costs, for reasons stated by Justice Bruno at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the plaintiff (1) from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.), dated June 7, 2001, and (2), as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of the same court dated January 9, 2003.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated June 7, 2001, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated January 9, 2003; and it is further,

Ordered, that the order dated January 9, 2003, is affirmed with one bill of costs, for reasons stated by Justice Bruno at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Brown v. City of New York, 5 A.D.3d 420, 772 N.Y.S.2d 613 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

5 A.D.3d 420 (Brown v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.