Brown v. City of New York

130 A.D.2d 701, 516 N.Y.S.2d 22, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46720
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 26, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 130 A.D.2d 701 (Brown v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. City of New York, 130 A.D.2d 701, 516 N.Y.S.2d 22, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46720 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Williams, J.), dated November 18, 1985, which granted the defendants’ motion at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff failed to present a prima facie case.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff commenced an action to recover damages for injuries sustained when she was allegedly stabbed by a fellow high school student while on school premises. In order to establish a prima facie case of negligence, a party must demonstrate, inter alia, the breach of a duty owed to her by the alleged tort-feasor (see, Solomon v City of New York, 66 NY2d 1026). We find that the plaintiff failed to meet this burden and, therefore, the trial court properly granted the defendants’ trial motion to dismiss. The negligence alleged by the plaintiff was that the defendant Board of Education of the City of New York had actual notice of the vicious propensities of the student who stabbed her and failed to take proper measures to curb those propensities and to protect her fellow classmates therefrom. The record indicates, however, that the Board of Education could not have envisioned the need for closer supervision at the time of the stabbing and that the [702]*702plaintiff failed to prove any breach of a duty by the defendants (see, Glick v City of New York, 53 AD2d 528, affd 42 NY2d 831). Bracken, J. P., Weinstein, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Student Bus Co., Inc.
2019 NY Slip Op 2146 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Pitner v. Brentwood Union Free School District
254 A.D.2d 340 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
McGregor v. City of New York
197 A.D.2d 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Mirand v. City of New York
190 A.D.2d 282 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Quinn v. City of New York
153 A.D.2d 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
McLoughlin v. Holy Cross High School
135 A.D.2d 513 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 A.D.2d 701, 516 N.Y.S.2d 22, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1987.