Brown v. City of Daytona Beach

286 So. 2d 547, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4162
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 5, 1973·No. No. 43,552·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J„ and BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. City of Daytona Beach, 286 So. 2d 547, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4162 (Fla. 1973).

286 So. 2d 547 (Brown v. City of Daytona Beach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Katz
108 So. 2d 60 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
City of Daytona Beach v. Brown
273 So. 2d 124 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)