Brown v. City of Daytona Beach

Supreme Court of Florida

Brown v. City of Daytona Beach

286 So. 2d 547, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4162

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedDecember 5, 1973

DocketNo. 43,552

StatusPublished

This text of 286 So. 2d 547 (Brown v. City of Daytona Beach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. City of Daytona Beach, 286 So. 2d 547, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4162 (Fla. 1973).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J„ and BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J„ and BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 So. 2d 547, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-city-of-daytona-beach-fla-1973.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack