Brown v. City of Columbia

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brown v. City of Columbia

495 S.W.3d 831, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 780, 2016 WL 4366482

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 16, 2016·No. WD 78829·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Albert Brown appeals- -an award issued by the Labor and '.-Industrial Relations Commission;. which denied his workers’ compensation claim for heat-related injuries he allegedly suffered in the course of his'employment as a recycling truck driver for the City of Columbia. Brown contends that the denial of his claim was unsupported by competent and substantial evidence. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Albert Brown appeals- -an award issued by the Labor and '.-Industrial Relations Commission;. which denied his workers’ compensation claim for heat-related injuries he allegedly suffered in the course of his'employment as a recycling truck driver for the City of Columbia. Brown contends that the denial of his claim was unsupported by competent and substantial evidence. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Brown v. City of Columbia, 495 S.W.3d 831, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 780, 2016 WL 4366482 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

495 S.W.3d 831 (Brown v. City of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.