Brown v. City of Atlanta
This text of 76 S.E. 72 (Brown v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Evidence that about nightfall on a Sunday the accused was seen in a buggy in one of the public pleasure parks of the city of Atlanta; that he began whistling to attract attention; that shortly thereafter two persons in a buggy.approached and the.accused reached down in his buggy and opened a valise containing eleven half-pints of whisky; that the persons who approached, seeing a police officer looking at the accused, declined to take the whisky, and that the accused at the time had three half-pints of whisky in his pocket, authorized his conviction as a “traveling blind-tiger,” under § 1640 of -the Code of the City of Atlanta. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 S.E. 72, 11 Ga. App. 755, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-city-of-atlanta-gactapp-1912.