Brown v. Circuit Court

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. Circuit Court

64 F. App'x 410

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 3, 2003

DocketNo. 03-1321

StatusPublished

This text of 64 F. App'x 410 (Brown v. Circuit Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Circuit Court, 64 F. App'x 410 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM':

Elliott R. Brown appeals from the district court’s denial his motions to reconsider the district court’s December 13, 2001 order dismissing his state law claims for declaratory relief, accounting, and restitution. We affirmed the district court’s December 13, 2001 order on appeal. See Brown v. Circuit Court of Fairfax County, 42 Fed.Appx. 590 (4th Cir.2002) (unpublished) (per curiam). Because we have already affirmed the district court’s disposition of his case, Brown’s further attacks on that order are barred by principles of res judicata. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM':

Elliott R. Brown appeals from the district court’s denial his motions to reconsider the district court’s December 13, 2001 order dismissing his state law claims for declaratory relief, accounting, and restitution. We affirmed the district court’s December 13, 2001 order on appeal. See Brown v. Circuit Court of Fairfax County, 42 Fed.Appx. 590 (4th Cir.2002) (unpublished) (per curiam). Because we have already affirmed the district court’s disposition of his case, Brown’s further attacks on that order are barred by principles of res judicata. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 F. App'x 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-circuit-court-ca4-2003.