Brown v. Childs

New York Supreme Court

Brown v. Childs

17 Johns. 1

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 15, 1819

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 17 Johns. 1 (Brown v. Childs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Childs, 17 Johns. 1 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1819).

Pincite

Opinion

*Per Curiam.

When an attorney is sued by writ, he is entitled to personal service of all notices, &c. in the same [8]*8manner as if he was sued by bill. We see no reason for any distinction in this respect. We should grant the motion, if a term had not intervened since the default was entered. The application on the part of the defendant ought to have been made at the last term, and we must, therefore, deny the motion.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*Per Curiam.

When an attorney is sued by writ, he is entitled to personal service of all notices, &c. in the same [8]*8manner as if he was sued by bill. We see no reason for any distinction in this respect. We should grant the motion, if a term had not intervened since the default was entered. The application on the part of the defendant ought to have been made at the last term, and we must, therefore, deny the motion.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Johns. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-childs-nysupct-1819.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack