Brown v. Chevy Chase Bank

505 F. App'x 255
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 22, 2013
DocketNo. 12-1880
StatusPublished

This text of 505 F. App'x 255 (Brown v. Chevy Chase Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Chevy Chase Bank, 505 F. App'x 255 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his civil case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. Chevy Chase Bank, No. 3:10-cv-00381-REP (E.D.Va. July 3, 2012). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
505 F. App'x 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-chevy-chase-bank-ca4-2013.