Brown v. Chevy Chase Bank

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. Chevy Chase Bank

505 F. App'x 255

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 22, 2013·No. No. 12-1880·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his civil case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. Chevy Chase Bank, No. 3:10-cv-00381-REP (E.D.Va. July 3, 2012). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his civil case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. Chevy Chase Bank, No. 3:10-cv-00381-REP (E.D.Va. July 3, 2012). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brown v. Chevy Chase Bank, 505 F. App'x 255 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

505 F. App'x 255 (Brown v. Chevy Chase Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.