Brown v. Central District Alarm, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brown v. Central District Alarm, Inc.

476 S.W.3d 310, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1178, 2015 WL 7253148

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 17, 2015·No. No. ED 102802·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kathleen Brown appeals the Labor and Industrial Commission’s decision denying her unemployment benefits. In a single point on appeal, Brown argues that the Commission erred in determining that she did not act in good faith when voluntarily terminating her employment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kathleen Brown appeals the Labor and Industrial Commission’s decision denying her unemployment benefits. In a single point on appeal, Brown argues that the Commission erred in determining that she did not act in good faith when voluntarily terminating her employment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Brown v. Central District Alarm, Inc., 476 S.W.3d 310, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1178, 2015 WL 7253148 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

476 S.W.3d 310 (Brown v. Central District Alarm, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.