Brown v. Castleberry
This text of Brown v. Castleberry (Brown v. Castleberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION RICKEY BROWN PLAINTIFF Reg. # 27002-510 Vv. 4:23CV00649-KGB-JTK SHARRON CASTLEBERRY, et al. DEFENDANTS
ORDER Defendant Castleberry submitted her sworn Affidavit in support of her Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. No. 32-1). In Defendant Castleberry’s Affidavit she references certain things Phillip Peckham, U.S. Marshals Service Detention Management Coordinator, confirmed to her. To the extent Defendant Castleberry’s Affidavit may contain hearsay in connection with her discussions with Mr. Peckham, Brooks v. Tri-Sys., Inc., 425 F.3d 1109, 1111 (8th Cir. 2005), the Court would find it helpful if Defendant Castleberry would provide an affidavit by Mr. Peckham detailing what he told Defendant Castleberry on which dates. It would also be helpful for the Court to know from Defendant Castleberry the dates on which she had contact with Mr. Peckham, or others from the U.S. Marshals Service, regarding Plaintiff's medical care and the substance of the contact on each date. If Defendant Castleberry wishes to supplement her Motion with the items mentioned above, she must do so within ten (10) days of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 17" day of May, 2024.
JEROME T. KEARNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brown v. Castleberry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-castleberry-ared-2024.