Brown v. Carlton
This text of 188 So. 2d 293 (Brown v. Carlton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner Brown seeks review of an Order of the Florida Industrial Commission which affirmed an Order of a deputy commissioner who denied a workmen’s compensation claim for additional benefits, medical treatment, expenses and penalties.
We have heard oral argument and have carefully considered the record and briefs. It appears that the Order of the deputy commissioner was supported by competent substantial evidence and that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of the law. The Petition for a Writ of Cer-tiorari is, therefore, denied, and the petitioner’s application for an additional attorney fee is, likewise, denied.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 So. 2d 293, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-carlton-fla-1966.