Brown v. Candelora
725 A.2d 176, 555 Pa. 478, 1999 Pa. LEXIS 677
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 16, 1999·No. Petition No. 101 E.D. Alloc. Dkt. 1998·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 1999, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the issue of whether the Superior Court erred by affirming the Order of the Court of Common Pleas granting Respondent Nation[479] wide’s petition to set aside Petitioners’ garnishment proceeding based on claims of bad faith even though those claims had not been expressly assigned to Petitioners by the insured and even though Nationwide had already paid the full limits of the insured’s policy.1
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. Candelora, 725 A.2d 176, 555 Pa. 478, 1999 Pa. LEXIS 677 (Pa. 1999).
725 A.2d 176 (Brown v. Candelora) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re R.H.R. Mechanical Contractors, Inc.
358 B.R. 202 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2006)
Sevast v. Kakouras
841 A.2d 1062 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2003)
Mutual Benefit Insurance v. Druce
62 Pa. D. & C.4th 31 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 2003)
Marks v. Nationwide Insurance Co.
762 A.2d 1098 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2000)
Benevento v. Life USA Holding, Inc.
61 F. Supp. 2d 407 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1999)