Brown v. Candelora

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Brown v. Candelora

725 A.2d 176

DecidedMarch 16, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 725 A.2d 176 (Brown v. Candelora) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Candelora, 725 A.2d 176 (Pa. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 16 day of March, 1999, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the issue of whether the Superior Court erred by affirming the Order of the Court of Common Pleas granting Respondent Nationwide’s petition to set aside Petitioners’ garnishment proceeding based on claims of bad faith even though those claims had not been expressly assigned to Petitioners by the insured and even though Nationwide had already paid the full limits of the insured’s policy.¹

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 16 day of March, 1999, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the issue of whether the Superior Court erred by affirming the Order of the Court of Common Pleas granting Respondent Nationwide’s petition to set aside Petitioners’ garnishment proceeding based on claims of bad faith even though those claims had not been expressly assigned to Petitioners by the insured and even though Nationwide had already paid the full limits of the insured’s policy.¹

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

725 A.2d 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-candelora-pa-1999.