Home/Tennessee Supreme Court/Brown v. Brown

Brown v. Brown

1 Thompson 41, 1 Shan. Cas. 25
CourtTennessee Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1849
StatusPublished
Cited by30 cases

This text of 1 Thompson 41 (Brown v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Brown, 1 Thompson 41, 1 Shan. Cas. 25 (Tenn. 1849).

Opinion

GrREBN, J.,

said that it was proper and allowable for a clerk and master to append to his report extracts from the proof to justify and illustrate his account, and that he approved of their so doing ; but to copy depositions at large or to take them and incorporate them into an account, and to charge as for an account, was an abuse.

Nelsoit made the question whether the Court would allow for several accounts in the same case. GrREBN, J., said he thought the proper practice would be to disallow the clerk’s costs in cases where he totally misconceived an order of reference, and so took an account as to require it to be set aside in toto ; but where it was merely modified upon - exceptions, the costs would be allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

L. C. Jones Trucking Co. v. Superior Oil Co.
234 P.2d 802 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1951)
Bradley v. Commissioner
1 T.C. 518 (U.S. Tax Court, 1943)
People v. Young
129 P.2d 353 (California Supreme Court, 1942)
Bodell v. Commissioner
47 B.T.A. 62 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1942)
Hughes v. Commissioner
44 B.T.A. 1196 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1941)
Cain v. Commissioner
43 B.T.A. 1133 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1941)
Bell v. Kates
18 A.2d 556 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1941)
Phipps v. Commissioner
43 B.T.A. 790 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1941)
In re the Estate of Cuddeback
168 Misc. 698 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1938)
B. Altman & Co. v. Durland
185 A.D. 114 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)
Ward v. Williams
118 N.E. 1021 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1918)
Jeffords v. Muldrow
89 S.E. 357 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1916)
In re the Probate of a Paper Writing Purporting to be the Last Will & Testament of Lord
14 Mills Surr. 303 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1915)
Hepner v. United States
213 U.S. 103 (Supreme Court, 1909)
In re the Estate of Dunning
5 Mills Surr. 145 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1905)
Dyson v. Jones
43 S.E. 667 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1903)
Tutorship of Minor Heirs & Succession of Kidd
26 So. 74 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1899)
Lai Say v. Kaaahu
10 Haw. 499 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1896)
Isley v. . Boon
18 S.E. 174 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1893)
Winnipiseogee Paper Co. v. Eaton
18 A. 171 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Thompson 41, 1 Shan. Cas. 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-brown-tenn-1849.