Brown v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brown v. Brown

31 A.D.2d 516, 294 N.Y.S.2d 802, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2960

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 7, 1968

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 31 A.D.2d 516 (Brown v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Brown, 31 A.D.2d 516, 294 N.Y.S.2d 802, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2960 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Interlocutory judgment) dated May 7,1968, in favor of plaintiff in this matrimonial action, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, by striking therefrom the provisions respecting custody, alimony and counsel fees and remanding the cause for an immediate trial by Trial Term, limited to the issues of custody, counsel fee and permanent alimony' based on the preseparation standard of living of the parties. (Brownstein v. Brownstein, 25 A D 2d 205, 208; Hearst v. Hearst, 3 A D 2d 706, affd. 3 N Y 2d 967.) There is insufficient proof in the record to base findings on the issues of permanent alimony and counsel fee and there is no proof on which to base custody. In fact, the trial court in effect foreclosed proof on the question of custody. The temporary alimony heretofore granted is ordered continued. In determining the amount of permanent alimony, the Trial Judge is not bound thereby but shall be guided solely by the evidence. Concur—Stevens, J. P., Steuer, Tilzer, Rabin and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Interlocutory judgment) dated May 7,1968, in favor of plaintiff in this matrimonial action, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, by striking therefrom the provisions respecting custody, alimony and counsel fees and remanding the cause for an immediate trial by Trial Term, limited to the issues of custody, counsel fee and permanent alimony' based on the preseparation standard of living of the parties. (Brownstein v. Brownstein, 25 A D 2d 205, 208; Hearst v. Hearst, 3 A D 2d 706, affd. 3 N Y 2d 967.) There is insufficient proof in the record to base findings on the issues of permanent alimony and counsel fee and there is no proof on which to base custody. In fact, the trial court in effect foreclosed proof on the question of custody. The temporary alimony heretofore granted is ordered continued. In determining the amount of permanent alimony, the Trial Judge is not bound thereby but shall be guided solely by the evidence. Concur—Stevens, J. P., Steuer, Tilzer, Rabin and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 516, 294 N.Y.S.2d 802, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-brown-nyappdiv-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack