Brown v. Brown

191 A.D. 917
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 203 A.D. 658

Opinion

Defendant’s [plaintiff’s] former medical practice has been interrupted by military service. In the period since his discharge from the army he has not regained his former income. Hence we do not now disturb the weekly alimony as decreed. We, however, vary the judgment by adding a clause at the foot thereof that in case the circumstances of either party change, an application may then be made to the court to modify the provision for alimony. As thus varied the judgment is affirmed, without costs of this appeal. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blaekmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Brown, 191 A.D. 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1920).

191 A.D. 917 (Brown v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.