Brown v. Brown

100 A. 604, 78 N.H. 337, 1917 N.H. LEXIS 7
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided February 6, 1917·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*338 Young, J.

As the facts are understood, the court has found that, the defendant without sufficient cause and without her husband’s consent has refused for more than three years together to live with him as his wife. On these facts there should be a decree for the plaintiff; for P. S., c. 175, s. 5, subdiv. x, provides that a divorce shall be decreed “when either party, without sufficient cause, and without the consent of the other, has abandoned and refused, for three years together, to cohabit with the other. ” The offence at which this subdivision is aimed is the abandonment of the relation of husband and wife, — not the abandonment of the house in which they were living as man and wife. That is a distinct cause for divorce. Ib., subdiv’s xi, xii. It is obvious, therefore, that the offence at which this section is aimed is one that may be committed as well when the parties live in the same house as when they live in different houses. "

Divorce decreed.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Brown, 100 A. 604, 78 N.H. 337, 1917 N.H. LEXIS 7 (N.H. 1917).

100 A. 604 (Brown v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bruner v. Bruner
135 N.E. 578 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1922)