Brown v. Brown

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Brown v. Brown

47 A. 591, 70 N.H. 623

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1899·Published

Opinion

Pike, J.

The provision of the will does not authorize the ox•ecutor to mortgage the real estate. The testatrix’s wish that certain real estate be retained “ so long as the same may be expedí *624 ent in a judicious administration ” of lier estate was simply a request that her executor should defer a sale (P. S., c. 194) so long-as practicable under the law relating to the settlement of estates-

Case discharged.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pike, J.

The provision of the will does not authorize the ox•ecutor to mortgage the real estate. The testatrix’s wish that certain real estate be retained “ so long as the same may be expedí *624 ent in a judicious administration ” of lier estate was simply a request that her executor should defer a sale (P. S., c. 194) so long-as practicable under the law relating to the settlement of estates-

Case discharged.

All concurred.

Brown v. Brown, 47 A. 591, 70 N.H. 623 (N.H. 1899).

Pincite

47 A. 591 (Brown v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.