Brown v. Brown

Supreme Court of Georgia

Brown v. Brown

168 S.E.2d 138, 225 Ga. 322, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 487

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 22, 1969

Docket25186

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 168 S.E.2d 138 (Brown v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Brown, 168 S.E.2d 138, 225 Ga. 322, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 487 (Ga. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Almand, Presiding Justice.

This appeal is from an order sustaining the motion of the defendant, J. S. Brown to dismiss the petition of E. L. and Ola Mae Brown, in which they sought specific performance of an oral contract for the purchase of a described tract of land. The transcript of the record was filed in the office of the clerk of this court on April 4, 1969. The appellant filed his enumeration of errors on April 17, 1969. The appellee has moved to dismiss the appeal for the failure of the appellant to comply with Rules 14 and 20 of the Supreme Court which provide that a failure to file enumerations of errors within 10 days after the docketing of the case in this court may be deemed a failure to perfect the appeal. Held:

No providential cause having been shown for the failure to comply with said rules, the motion to dismiss is sustained. Napier v. Napier, 222 Ga. 681 (151 SE2d 712).

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Almand, Presiding Justice.

This appeal is from an order sustaining the motion of the defendant, J. S. Brown to dismiss the petition of E. L. and Ola Mae Brown, in which they sought specific performance of an oral contract for the purchase of a described tract of land. The transcript of the record was filed in the office of the clerk of this court on April 4, 1969. The appellant filed his enumeration of errors on April 17, 1969. The appellee has moved to dismiss the appeal for the failure of the appellant to comply with Rules 14 and 20 of the Supreme Court which provide that a failure to file enumerations of errors within 10 days after the docketing of the case in this court may be deemed a failure to perfect the appeal. Held:

No providential cause having been shown for the failure to comply with said rules, the motion to dismiss is sustained. Napier v. Napier, 222 Ga. 681 (151 SE2d 712).

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 S.E.2d 138, 225 Ga. 322, 1969 Ga. LEXIS 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-brown-ga-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack