Brown v. Brown

388 So. 2d 623, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17265
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 24, 1980·No. Nos. 80-80, 80-1037·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

ANSTEAD, Judge.

In a final judgment of dissolution the wife was initially awarded custody of the parties’ minor children. Because the wife refused to comply with a subsequent court order directing her to bring herself and the children from New Jersey to Florida, the court ordered the custody of the children transferred to the husband. No hearing was conducted or findings made as to whether transfer of custody would be in the best interests of the children.

This court has previously recognized that a trial court has broad discretion to effect compliance with its orders. Gordon v. Gordon, 368 So.2d 1356 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). However, before an order may be entered modifying the custody provisions of a final judgment or otherwise transferring custody, a determination must be made that a change in custody is in the best interests of the children. Baker v. Baker, 360 So.2d 19 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). The transfer of custody of minor children should not be used as a means of punishing recalcitrant parties to dissolution proceedings. When a change in custody is sought nothing less than a showing that such change is required to serve the best interests of the child will justify granting such a change.

Accordingly, this cause is reversed and remanded with directions for further proceedings consistent herewith.

MOORE, J., concurs. BERANEK, J., concurs with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Brown, 388 So. 2d 623, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17265 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

388 So. 2d 623 (Brown v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elkins v. Vanden Bosch
433 So. 2d 1251 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Brown v. Tan
395 So. 2d 1249 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)