Brown v. Brown

Supreme Court of Alabama

Brown v. Brown

115 Ala. 696

DecidedNovember 15, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 115 Ala. 696 (Brown v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Brown, 115 Ala. 696 (Ala. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

This action was brought by the appellant against the appellee, to recover damages for the breach of an injunction bond.

Upon the trial of the cause, the court gave the general affirmative charge for the defendant, and there were verdict and judgment accordingly. The bill of exceptions on the present appeal does not purport to set out all the evidence, and the court holds that the judgment, must, therefore, be affirmed upon the following authorities: M. & E. R. Co. v. Kolb, 73 Ala. 396; Alexander v. Alexander, 71 Ala. 295; Hosea v. Talbert, 65 Ala. 173.

Opinion by

Head, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This action was brought by the appellant against the appellee, to recover damages for the breach of an injunction bond.

Upon the trial of the cause, the court gave the general affirmative charge for the defendant, and there were verdict and judgment accordingly. The bill of exceptions on the present appeal does not purport to set out all the evidence, and the court holds that the judgment, must, therefore, be affirmed upon the following authorities: M. & E. R. Co. v. Kolb, 73 Ala. 396; Alexander v. Alexander, 71 Ala. 295; Hosea v. Talbert, 65 Ala. 173.

Opinion by

Head, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 Ala. 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-brown-ala-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack