Brown v. Brown

115 Ala. 696
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1896·Published

Opinion

This action was brought by the appellant against the appellee, to recover damages for the breach of an injunction bond.

Upon the trial of the cause, the court gave the general affirmative charge for the defendant, and there were verdict and judgment accordingly. The bill of exceptions on the present appeal does not purport to set out all the evidence, and the court holds that the judgment, must, therefore, be affirmed upon the following authorities: M. & E. R. Co. v. Kolb, 73 Ala. 396; Alexander v. Alexander, 71 Ala. 295; Hosea v. Talbert, 65 Ala. 173.

Opinion by

Head, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Brown, 115 Ala. 696 (Ala. 1896).

115 Ala. 696 (Brown v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hosea v. Talbert
65 Ala. 173 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1880)
Alexander v. Alexander
71 Ala. 295 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1882)
Montgomery & Eufaula Railway Co. v. Kolb
73 Ala. 396 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1882)