Brown v. Brockett

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. Brockett

585 F. App'x 133

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 4, 2014

DocketNo. 13-2339

StatusPublished

This text of 585 F. App'x 133 (Brown v. Brockett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Brockett, 585 F. App'x 133 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ramona Brockett appeals the district court’s order denying Brockett’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial following the jury’s verdict in favor of Jordan Brown on his claim for defamation, and challenges the amount of damages remitted upon the court’s grant of Brockett’s motion for a remittitur. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Brockett, No. 1:11-cv-00240-JFM (D.Md. Oct. 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ramona Brockett appeals the district court’s order denying Brockett’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial following the jury’s verdict in favor of Jordan Brown on his claim for defamation, and challenges the amount of damages remitted upon the court’s grant of Brockett’s motion for a remittitur. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Brockett, No. 1:11-cv-00240-JFM (D.Md. Oct. 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

585 F. App'x 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-brockett-ca4-2014.