Brown v. BRECON COMMONS, LLC
This text of 618 N.W.2d 765 (Brown v. BRECON COMMONS, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Edwin Deon BROWN and Latisha Brown, Plaintiffs-Appellees and Cross-Appellants,
v.
BRECON COMMONS, L.L.C. and Saline Plaza Limited Partnership, Defendants, and
Charles Reinhart Company and Phoenix Contractors, Inc., Defendants-Appellants and Cross-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellants from the May 11, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals, the motion to dismiss, the motions for immediate consideration, and the motion for stay are considered. The motions for immediate consideration are GRANTED. Pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we STAY enforcement of the trial court judgment pending the decision of the Court of Appeals on any review concerning that judgment and, if applicable, until this Court acts on a subsequent timely application for leave to appeal from any such decision by the Court of Appeals. In the unique circumstances of this case, we are not persuaded that plaintiffs should be allowed to enforce their judgment pending the completion of appellate review.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
618 N.W.2d 765, 2000 WL 1708468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-brecon-commons-llc-mich-2000.