Brown v. Bradley

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Brown v. Bradley

127 S.E. 210, 131 S.C. 268, 1925 S.C. LEXIS 121

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedMarch 10, 1925

Docket11713

StatusPublished

This text of 127 S.E. 210 (Brown v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Bradley, 127 S.E. 210, 131 S.C. 268, 1925 S.C. LEXIS 121 (S.C. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Marion.

The appeal is from order of his Honor, Judge W. H. Townsend, which sufficiently states the essential facts. After careful consideration, we are of the opinion that the conclusion reached by the Circuit Judge is correct.

It is accordingly adjudged that the order appealed from be affirmed for the reasons therein stated.

Messrs. Justices Watts and Fraser and Mr. Acting Associate Justice W. C. Cothran concur. Mr. Chief Justice Gary and Mr. Justice T. P. Cothran did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Marion.

The appeal is from order of his Honor, Judge W. H. Townsend, which sufficiently states the essential facts. After careful consideration, we are of the opinion that the conclusion reached by the Circuit Judge is correct.

It is accordingly adjudged that the order appealed from be affirmed for the reasons therein stated.

Messrs. Justices Watts and Fraser and Mr. Acting Associate Justice W. C. Cothran concur. Mr. Chief Justice Gary and Mr. Justice T. P. Cothran did not participate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 S.E. 210, 131 S.C. 268, 1925 S.C. LEXIS 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-bradley-sc-1925.