Brown v. Blackshear

241 F. App'x 773
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. Blackshear. Read the opinion of the Court — 128 S. Ct. 2081
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided September 19, 2007·No. No. 06-4786-cv·Published

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-Appellant Shirley A. Brown appeals from a district court decision dismissing her complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), (iii). She brought an action against Defendants-Appellees Cornelius Blackshear, a federal bankruptcy judge, and Jody Kava, an attorney representing the bankruptcy estate, as well as Trustee-Appellee Jeffrey Sapir, alleging that her bankruptcy case was improperly handled.

We review this dismissal de novo. Giano v. Goord, 250 F.3d 146, 149-50 (2d Cir.2001). For substantially the same reasons given by the district court, we find that Appellant has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

We have considered all of Brown’s claims and find them without merit. The judgment of the district court is therefore AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Blackshear, 241 F. App'x 773 (2d Cir. 2007).

241 F. App'x 773 (Brown v. Blackshear) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Giano v. Goord
250 F.3d 146 (Second Circuit, 2001)