Brown v. Birdseye Division of General Foods Corp.

200 So. 2d 177, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3936
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 21, 1967
DocketNo. 36143
StatusPublished

This text of 200 So. 2d 177 (Brown v. Birdseye Division of General Foods Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Birdseye Division of General Foods Corp., 200 So. 2d 177, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3936 (Fla. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record and briefs and have heard oral argument. We find [178]*178that in entering the order under attack the respondent Commission did not depart from the essential requirements of the law. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and BARNS (Ret.), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 So. 2d 177, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-birdseye-division-of-general-foods-corp-fla-1967.